Is Brahman androgynous? (HMW Blog) (blog.hindumediawiki.com) Ishvara

2 points | Post submitted by ichat 1022 days ago | 0 comments | viewed 889 times

Link of Web Resource/Blog/Video : blog.hindumediawiki.com

The blog is nicely put. However, I see that a major point is being missed out completely. The point is - why do we insist on seeing male or female aspects in things? What does this aspect of being male or female actually mean - what do they represent? Of course, we are not talking about a physical body with male and female reproductive organs there. It has to be something more subtle - more at a fundamental level of consciousness and attributes that compels us to think something as male and something else as female. What exactly is that trait?

Once we can answer this - then we need to look back at this question, and all those associated references. Brahman is nirgun, nirakar - but most importantly, Brahman does not "interact" with anyone, or in any process. However, Shiva does. Shakti does. Narayana does. Hence Their interactions hold the key to understand the trait we - the disillusioned souls - attribute back to them. Their very nature does not change by our attribution - but our perception is what plays the game.

Think about it - and comment below - what does it mean to be feminine and masculine?


NoAnswer posted, be the first one.

Please Login or Signup to leaveAnswer

Welcome to HMW!


This site is for discussion about Hinduism.

You must have an account here to participate. Its free to use this site.

Register here >>>>

Suggested for you

Books based on Hinduism

Explore 101 Books You Must Read

Upanisads: (Selections from 108 Upanisads)

Click here to Buy From Indic Brands

"Indic Brands" is a curated marketplace of remarkable brands that value and celebrate our cherished cultural heritage.

We do NOT offer personalized advice based on Astrology.

Check the Guidelines for posting >>>>