Hindu Media Wiki

There are 4 points in demolishing Ambedkarism –

1,Ambedkar didnt make Constitution

2.He did not give reservation

3.He did not give women code bill or women rights

4.He was working with british opposing India;s freedom tillvery last

No explanation is needed for 1,3,4

2 is most imp point becoz of which most SC/ST considerAmbedkar as their God.This has to be debunked

It was not just Ambedkarbut many Hindu SC/ST leaders who demanded Reservation for SC/St in ConstituentAssembly . Many demands of Ambedkar on Reservation were rejected in ConstituentAssembly like asking for reservation in Cabinet,Army,separate cities,villages forDalits, This shows that it was the magnanimity and large heartedness of leadersof Constituent assembly(who were mainly UC's) that they gave reservation to SC/ST's. So the myth amongDalits that Ambedkar was their Messaih and saviour needs to be debunked.Further India as a country was also formed becoz Rajputs agreed to merge theirkingdoms with the Indian union otherwise there would be no SC/ST and noreservation .

Ambedkar never won any election in his Life. He was severely criticized byMany prominent Dalit Leaders of that time becoz of his workings with British (This will give courage to Dalits in examining Ambedkar) .Almost All prominent Dalitssupported Gandhi,Nehru and Congress.None no one  respected Ambedkar

How did Ambedkar got into Constituent Assembly – Nehru and Patel greatlydisliked Ambedkar and did not want him in Assemby. Sir William Ivor Jennings, was their first choice for the Chairmanshipof the Drafting Committee of the Indian Constitution and they wanted to hire Americanand European Legal experts in drafting Constitution.  It was Gandhi's self-righteous hubris thatimposed Ambedkar upon India. And the result is that India's fate and futurewere ruined. But why did Gandhi instructed Nehru to include Ambedkar inAssembly despitedAmbedkar abusing , bad mouthing Gandhi and Congress throughouthis Life. Congress Party’s tallest Dalit Leader Babu Javjivan Ram wife revealedtruth in her diary – Ambedkar ki sifarish that Ambedkar begged Javjivan Ram bycrying at his feets (yes that is what she wrote) that he is ready to apologizeto Gandhi,Nehru and please incl him in Assembly.

There is a Common misconception among Dalits that had Ambedkar was notthere,they would never had got fundamental rights.This is a MYTH which we mustdebunk thereby enabling return of Dalits towards our side

1.    is this video from Keshav bedi where hedemonstrates that Congress had already promised fundamental rights and allkinds of rights in its resolutions from 1921 to 1946 to every citizen of india

2.    https://youtu.be/rT2PA8wFw2U
Even if Ambedkar was not present ,There were 30 SC and 31 ST members inConstituent Assembly apart from Ambedkar

2.Hindu Mahasabha and Savarkar also drafted a Constitution in which theyalso promised fundamental rights and all kinds of rights to every citizen ofindia .This is a solid counter to Ambedkarites claim that Had Ambedkar notdrafted the Constitution,India would have been run on Manusmriti

3.Many countries(aprox 120) got freedom from Colonial powers similar toindia in 20th century.each of these countries made its constitution whichpromised fundamental rights and all kinds of rights to its citizens

this quora answer illustrates this in depth

 https://quora.com/What-is-this-fuzz-about-Ambedkar-Did-he-really-make-the-Indian-Constitution-and-his-authority-on-Hinduism/answer/Subhash-Chandra-Gautama

Amebdkar was fighting imaginary Brahminism and supportingBritish rule in India when -

British were running prostitution centers throughout Indiaby kidnapping Hindu Women ,

Venereal Disease and the Prostitution Policy of the BritishRaj

t.co/UrikBAf536?amp=1

British rule killed crores of people by engineering Faminesn droughts ,he was fighting imaginary BRahminism

31 famines in 120 years of British Raj when compared to 17in the 2000 years of India's history

t.co/L13oM1qrvE?amp=1

Brits introduced 6 waves of Cholera ,Malaria ,typhoid andmassive flu ,which killed around 2 crore people in India

how the 1918 Influenza flu Pandemic spread in India and howthe great Hindi poet, Suryakant Tripathi 'Nirala' described the grim situationin his account.Creation of massive untouchability throughout INDIA

poemsandchronicles.blogspot.com/2020/06/nirala-1918-influenza-flu-india.html?m=1

When Brits snatched Lands of common people through Zamindarisystem

when British rule destroyed most of native traditionalIndustries in India thereby creating massive unemployment issue in India

When British destroyed villages,cities,water resourcesthroughout India.

India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millionsdisappeared...'

t.co/vBYg01A1Lp?amp=1

Consider -In 1918,The British introduced deadly Spanish Fluwhich created massive untouchability and killed around 3-4 crore People inIndia In 1942-46 period,the Brits again engineered massive droughts and faminesn rampant Cholera,Malaria spread due to their Ill-practices which again killedmore than 4 crore People in India. In Both the times,Ambedkar was working withBritish ,serving in their Govt, ,He never said a single word to them but wasopposing India's freedom.

There is not one instance, not one single, solitary instancein which Ambedkar participated in any activity connected with that struggle tofree the country'.Dr BR Ambedkar complete and collected Works comprise aroundmore than 15000 pages.You will not find a single reference where he opposedBritish rule.

British killed around 20-25 crore people during their entirerule in south Asia . If 3-4 crore Dalits at that time also were killed bythem,i dont think it would have made any difference

Was Ambedkar an original thinker or did he just utter what the Brits wanted to hear?

1. Did Dalits not die in Artificial Famines created by the British?

2. Were Dalits not barred from Clubs too, where there were signs of Dogs and Indians not allowed?

3. What did Ambedkar do when Bhagat Singh was hanged or Chauri Chaura accused were prosecuted?

4. What did Ambedkar do regarding the deeply divisive and discriminatory Criminal Tribes Act, passed by the very British that he so actively supported?

5. How did any aspect of Brahmanism even remotely compare to British Colonialism, assuming the latter was less evil?

6. Why did Ambedkar believe Caste system to be more evil than American Slavery, as he mentioned in AOC? Was Ambedkar ever transported across oceans in chains only to have his language beaten out of him (assuming he'd survive) and forced to work on plantations for generations?

How many Dalits were affected by the nearly cyclic relationship between "Deindustrialization" and "Drain of Wealth"?

Prestigious Prizes, "background stories" and good PR are ways to create synthetic celebrities, meant to be placed within a society by an invisible elite. Arundhati Roy, Gandhi, Ambedkar, Malala Yousafzai, Greta Thurnberg, Periyar the pedophile....all fit this pattern.

Let us debunk some popular claims to defend him

CLAIM - Ambedkar gave rights.,eg-Constitution , Hindu code bill etc

TRUTH -Many countries got independence from colonial powers in late 20 century,along with India,India was not an exception.The Modern day nation states running on democracy is a recent day creation.Check for urself .Sir BN Rau was responsible for original Constitution.Universal Education to people is a modern day concept.this was not given by Ambedkar. Ambedkar never made the Indian Constitution Pak,Afg,Bang,Nepal,Bhutan,Myanmar ,Sri Lanka , Maldives also made their own Constitution without any help from Ambedkar Many countries became independent after India,also made their own Constitution - Guyana, Fiji, The Gambia, Ghana, Grenada ,Bahrain, Cameroon ,

So what special thing did Ambedkar did that we are worshipping him.

Claim -Ambedkar gave Education rights to people,

TRUTH - How? In which country , was there a Universal Education system,-AFRICA Europe ,Middle East ,North America ,South America ,Australia ,China ,Russia . where please check and tell me ?Most of Religious books got translated in only late 19 century?Before that they were only in hands of few.

CLAIM - If Ambedkar was not there ,India would have been running on Manusmriti

TRUTH - Manuvaad-this is classical tactic of Smear the opponent first and rest of the time will be spent by him to prove he is not that and then you win.a method of debate of the Frankfurt School which global LEFT uses from which SJW-ism comes. Ask them to give proof- what is wrong in Manusmriti and in which part of India was Manusmriti applied.Manusmriti was never adminisetered as law book ever in Indian society.Most Indians were unaaware abt this until British resurrected it.Laws in India were always local made.

CLAIM -Lower Castes were denied Education for thousands of years.Ambedkar was fighting for that

TRUTH -In which country,society ,was there a Universal Education system before 19 century before invention of printing press,AFRICA Europe ,Middle East ,North America ,South America ,Australia ,China ,Russia-Please check n tell me.were Physics ,Chemistry ,Maths existed before 1500 AD. People were denied Access to VEdas learning .
Response is No one was intersted in LEarning Vedas.the knowledge contained in Vedas was passed in form of Puranas. EVen today when Vedas are available in print, no one is interested in learning them.
In British India, Hindus who were labelled as upper castes by british were made to held most of the jobs in the lower branches of civil administration, and in education, they were, made to be comparatively, streets ahead.

point to be noted-british barred any lower caste hindu to either study or apply for any govt job.this was than used by British for dividing Hindus.

CLAIM - Ambedkar opened Schools ,Colleges.

TRUTH - every freedom fighter did the same thing . So ,what special thing had Ambedkar done

CLAIM - Ambedkar knew that barbaric oppressor castes will commit more heinous atrocities if power is transferred to them frm benevolent British.he didn't participate in freedom struggle for a few upper caste & so called nationalists but he stood for the actual freedom of thousands of untouchables (from India itself, mind you) who didn't even know what 'freedom' was. Ambedkar was fighting social problems

TRUTH - Why it is that Apart from Ambedkar , no other Freedom fighter thought about this. there were many Dalit leaders apart from Ambedkar like Babu Jagjivan Ram ,Pramatha Ranjan Thakur who were staunch Hindus who fought for India's freedom unlike Amebdkar whereas Ambedkar was fighting opposing India’s freedom.,they also never thought about this.
Remembering It were the BRITS who were ruling India at that point.Why is it that Ambedkar wanted separate DALITISTAN n wanted to be its leader. Why is it that He creaetd a new Religion -Ambedkarism.
think about it -this man opposed India’s freedom,was working with British,wanted a separate DALITISTAN,created a new Religion. Example -

Those social problems could be dealt later on but he was hell bent on spoiling the effort of others. First priority should be nation but he was falsely accusing religion which he was unable to understand or just his propaganda. But I dare to say he was wrong on some points.

Here’s Ambedkar fantasising about an imaginary shepherd in the Middle East, while clearly drawing inspiration from Christian Europe for our constitution (copied) but looking for social justice in a tradition that affirms the Vedic view which he wanted to escape !

Source - Ambedkar: life and mission by Dhananjay Keer.